New Zealand Equality Education Foundation

(incorporating the International Ex-Fetus Association)

Looking for a few good women...

© Tom Miller 2006

Not that there aren't more than a few, but, as true equality advocates and activists, we seek out and listen for women who detest the feminist, propaganda, hate-agenda BS. These good women clearly reason and proclaim why and how feminism is hurting the men, fathers and boys in their lives and whom they know, but also that feminism is hurting them and all women too, most of all. Feminism should receive the ultimate Darwin Award (cleansing itself from the human gene pool by its own sheer stupidity - actions destroying itself).

I got my first clue that women were more abusive than men from so many women themselves who swore this was so. I didn't quite believe them, at first... But now it makes sense, not just because of the reams of research I've gone over. Good women see the abusive, manipulative, lying women first hand, and before men do. For starters, they dealt with these manipulative, lying, abusive ones ALL the way through school as kids. They watched/experienced those girls grow up only to destroy themselves and all those around them with their lies and destructive, abusive, manipulative behaviors and often ending up divorced and miserable, blaming the misery of their own making onto the man they divorced, or who divorced her for REAL abuse. But most men are patient and want to "work on the relationship" far more than these women want to. These patient men put up with the abuse until the woman projects it all onto him and divorces him because of her own abusiveness...

Yes I do believe those women now, who told me that women are more abusive and more often than men. Feminists are the sickest of all women. Feminism is the collecting pool for the most mentally ill, detached and destructive of all women (and men). Some of these men can also be called hyper-chivalrous as well as feminist. They denounce their own for the rewards from the oppressor enemy who adopt them, for now.

A great book for ferreting out the better women, whom you'd want to be with or even marry, is Dr. Laura's Proper Care and Feeding of Husbands - very anti-feminist and anti-double standards. I don't think I could get involved with a woman unless SHE wants to read it (or preferably already has on her own and loves it already, on her own initiative), not because I reasoned with her or convinced her or "made" her read the book. I know enough now to tell whether a woman likes real equality or is faking it.

Since protection of women is so precious, politically correct, wonderful and paramount, our closest allies are the many women who detest feminism on the basis that "feminism uses and spits out women," not just men, children families and society. Yes, stop the REAL abuse of women in making them miserable through feminist abuse of them. Dr. Laura points this out too, that women are responsible for most of their own misery and unhappiness by being so self centered and rejecting actual equality, reciprocal consideration, respect and kindness. Even though most women are not feminists and don't like feminism in general, Dr. Laura claims that the majority of women still unwittingly buy into feminist "me first and only" practices deeply ingrained into modern society anyway, making themselves unhappy and bitchy (bitchy is just a nice word for abusive).

I've heard more than one feminist book review (of Dr. Laura's book) saying that it encourages women to accept men who just want lots of sex and a woman who will be nice to him. "Nice" is just a nicer way of saying not abusive.

But then again, as Thomas Ellis in his book, The Rantings of a Single Male, said in his chapter, Rant M - The missing part of the female brain, it's not logic women lack (though we see virtually no signs of logic from feminists, who are technically not women but a third gender hell-bent on destroying the other two, and especially their children) but the ability to see themselves in the reversed role of their male partner or men in their lives and to act equally according to that insight, using the golden rule.

I personally thought this was simply called empathy. Women supposedly have all of the empathy and men have none. Right... But we find that it is the men, especially of the men's and fathers' movement, that have more empathy than anyone, especially when it comes to empathy crossing gender boundaries. That's where men really "dominate" over women, and always have. Men have long lived to make women happy, to protect and provide for them.

Is giving anything back in return such a bad thing? Yes, according to feminists. We can see ourselves in women's shoes (no, not literally, unless you're a drag queen...), but fewer women can see themselves in our shoes (OK, maybe some of the really butch ones literally can). So many women lack this insight, because as Ellis says, it's not to their advantage to see or acknowledge their superior position, or the way they walk all over men to get that. So why should they see and acknowledge it, if they are getting so much more "equality" than men are? It's those women who see it our way (the walk in another's shoes, the golden rule way) that we look for to speak out with us, for their good and our good and the good of our children, the next generation.

Last Update: 26 March 2006