| |
We are all judges and jurors in the Court
of public opinion, so to speak, but only one side of the case gets stated
in Western media and in Western education systems, on Sex War issues.
Because of the lack of organized Masculist resistance, Feminists are allowed
to get away with all kinds of sophistry.
- Feminists are allowed to plead both sides of an argument in different
contexts. They have acquired a Women's Room at Victoria University of
Wellington (New Zealand), so that women can breast-feed in private --
but one Male Feminist journalist on Radio New Zealand thought it was
so obvious that a female Parliamentarian in Australia should be allowed
to breast-feed her baby in Parliament's Debating Chamber that he didn't
even bother to hide his prejudice from listeners ! The point is that
some men might be embarrassed by bare breasts in public, and some men
might not -- but it is not up to women to decide by
themselves that they need privacy for breast-feeding in one context,
but that they should be allowed to breast-feed in public in another
context !
- One Law School tutor made a cynical aside to the females in her tutorial
about how, in Tort law, pregnant women were not regarded as fully mentally
competent. She backed her criticism up by saying that pregnant women
were obviously competent to hold down jobs. I pointed out that she could
not possibly use the fact that that pregnant women held down jobs in
New Zealand as evidence that pregnant women were mentally competent,
because it was illegal under
Human Rights legislation for an employer to discriminate against pregnant
women ! There could be any number of mentally incompetent pregnant women
holding down jobs, because the Feminists had got a law passed that made
them declared competent !
- In a Parliamentary Select Committee hearing,
I mentioned some research that I had come across that showed that pregnant
women in fact do not function as well mentally as when they are not
pregnant. I was challenged on this point by Labour MP Lianne Dalziell
(currently Minister of Immigration and Associate Minister of Justice),
so I offered to send her the precise reference. She then said she didn't
want to have the reference to the research article ! In other words,
she was simply not interested in research results that contradicted
her Feminist ideology.
|