New Zealand Equality Education Foundation

(incorporating the International Ex-Fetus Association)

Were Rex Widerstrom & Graham Capill set up for sex crimes ?

© Peter Zohrab 2006

 

Home Page
alt.mens-rights FAQ
1000 links
Articles about Issues
Quotations
Male-Friendly Lawyers, Psychologists & Paralegals
Email us !
Sex, Lies & Feminism
Site-map

Conspiracies (= forward planning)

In his famous interview in April 2005 with Investigate Magazine, former Labour Party Minister John Tamihere discussed how the Leftists and Feminists in the Labout Party had deliberately lost the 1993 general election, so that the pro-male Mike Moore would be replaced as Party Leader by the anti-male Helen Clark. Investigate Magazine then asked:

This goes back to the great conspiracy theory. Most people like you and I can't get our heads around the idea that someone can sit in a darkened room and figure out where they want to be in fifteen years. Where do they get the time to do that ?

John Tamihere replied:

They don't have families. They've got nothing but the ability to plot. I've gotta take my kid to soccer on Saturday, they don't. So they just go and have a parlez-vous francais somewhere and a latte, whereas we don't get to plot, we're just trying to get our kids to synchronise their left and right feet.

The Feminists are organised, focused, and play the man as well as -- in fact, even more than -- the ball.

 

Widerstrom and Capill

In 2002, Rex Widerstrom, formerly a leading figure in the New Zealand First party, was found not guilty in Australia of seven sex charges involving a 14-year-old girl he met over the Internet. See the webpage: http://wysiwygnews.com/2002_News/2002May10.html .

In July 2005, former Christian Heritage Party leader the Rev. Graham Capill was sentenced to nine years in prison for sex offences, including rape, of girls under the age of 12. See the webpage: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0507/S00208.htm

What do these two men have in common -- apart from the sex charges? They were both leading New Zealand pro-men or pro-family activists. Rex Widerstrom was associated in media reports with the one-time appearance in the New Zealand First manifesto of a proposal to create a Ministry of Men's Affairs. And Graham Capill for many years headed the party that was most strongly and openly anti-Feminist.

I consider that both men were probably set up by Feminists, based on my experience with Feminists, who are usually too stupid to put up logical arguments, but who are constantly "playing the man, instead of the ball." Specifically, I have found Feminists often trying to compromise me sexually. The most extreme example was in a supermarket once, when a woman lifted up her young (about 6-year-old) daughter in front of me as I came around a corner, and the girl spread her legs out horizontally about as wide as she could, displaying her panties. I have also had experiences where an adult woman exposes substantial cleavage to me, and then, shortly after, I come across a young girl who is trying to attract my attention. In my view, these were deliberate (and unsuccessful) attempts to get me to be attracted to young girls, by a process of sensitisation.

This proves, to my satisfaction, at least, that Feminist mothers can and do get their children to provoke illegal sexual behaviour in men, for the purpose of discrediting them, for political or custody/access purposes, etc..

  • It is important to note that child sexual abuse is basically associated with penises, because it has been the Feminists who have been driving the hysteria about child sexual abuse in recent years. Child sexual abuse which does not involve penises (especially if it invoves female perpetrators) is regarded as relatively innocuous. See Penis Envy, Breast-Feeding, and Child Sexual Abuse.
  • Human sexuality is not limited to the heterosexual missionary position, although many moralists in various places and at various times have tried and are trying to limit it to that. Feminists in Western countries have been liberalising sex laws so as to increase the legal risks that heterosexual men run as regards sex, and to legalise sexual activities that the Feminists' power base (women, Lesbians and Homosexuals) like to engage in, such as prostitution and Lesbian/homosexual sex.

 

Conclusion

Men have to organise and take action. Just putting up with oppression "like a man" just doesn't cut it.

 

 
Home FAQ Links Issues Quotes Lawyers Email us ! Book SiteMap
 

Last Update: 11 February 2006

 
Top