Conspiracies (= forward planning)
In his famous interview in April 2005
with Investigate Magazine, former Labour Party Minister John
Tamihere discussed how the Leftists and Feminists in the Labout Party
had deliberately lost the 1993 general election, so that the pro-male
Mike Moore would be replaced as Party Leader by the anti-male Helen
Clark. Investigate Magazine then asked:
This goes back to the great conspiracy theory. Most people like
you and I can't get our heads around the idea that someone can sit
in a darkened room and figure out where they want to be in fifteen
years. Where do they get the time to do that ?
John Tamihere replied:
They don't have families. They've got nothing but
the ability to plot. I've gotta take my kid to soccer on Saturday,
they don't. So they just go and have a parlez-vous francais
somewhere and a latte, whereas we don't get to plot, we're just trying
to get our kids to synchronise their left and right feet.
The Feminists are organised, focused, and play
the man as well as -- in fact, even more than -- the ball.
Widerstrom and Capill
In 2002, Rex Widerstrom, formerly a leading
figure in the New Zealand First party, was found not guilty in Australia
of seven sex charges involving a 14-year-old girl he met over the Internet.
See the webpage: http://wysiwygnews.com/2002_News/2002May10.html
.
In July 2005, former Christian Heritage Party leader the Rev. Graham
Capill was sentenced to nine years in prison for sex offences, including
rape, of girls under the age of 12. See the webpage: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0507/S00208.htm
What do these two men have in common -- apart from the sex charges?
They were both leading New Zealand pro-men or pro-family activists.
Rex Widerstrom was associated in media reports with the one-time appearance
in the New Zealand First manifesto of a proposal to create a Ministry
of Men's Affairs. And Graham Capill for many years headed the party
that was most strongly and openly anti-Feminist.
I consider that both men were probably set up
by Feminists, based on my experience with Feminists, who are
usually too stupid to put up logical arguments, but who are constantly
"playing the man, instead of the ball." Specifically, I have
found Feminists often trying to compromise me sexually. The most extreme
example was in a supermarket once, when a woman lifted up her young
(about 6-year-old) daughter in front of me as I came around a corner,
and the girl spread her legs out horizontally about as wide as she could,
displaying her panties. I have also had experiences where an adult woman
exposes substantial cleavage to me, and then, shortly after, I come
across a young girl who is trying to attract my attention. In my view,
these were deliberate (and unsuccessful) attempts to get me to be attracted
to young girls, by a process of sensitisation.
This proves, to my satisfaction, at least, that
Feminist mothers can and do get their children to provoke illegal sexual
behaviour in men, for the purpose of discrediting them, for political
or custody/access purposes, etc..