Lawyer Gary Gotlieb is on record as having
said that he is apparently one of the "Good Guys", as far
as the Fathers' Movement is concerned. I can vouch for that -- I spoke
to him many years ago when it became clear that he was the only lawyer
I had heard of who believed that Human Rights covered men, as well as
women! Maybe that was the reason why one of the bimbos at Dyke TV (a.k.a.
TV Wom or TV One) caught him off-guard and got him to reluctantly agree,
when she asked him if three Polynesian women would have got more compensation
if they had been White Males. I've been caught like that a few times,
when you say something you don't really agree with, in order to be polite,
and because you don't have any statistics to refer to.
The printed story at http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/411368/850656
only says:
"Their lawyer Gary Gotlieb believes the reason the case has
been handled so badly by the government, is because the trio are all
Polynesians."
But the broadcast version mentioned the fact that they were women,
as well.
Of course, journalists are usually so stupid that they think, "Duh
-- women -- duh -- oppressed" as a basic fact of life like hairdos
and nail-polish, so it could just be that this bimbo thought that she
was being clever and analytical.
In fact, a Ministry of Justice research study at http://www.justice.govt.nz./pubs/reports/1999/sentence_in_nz/chapter_11.html#11.3.4
states:
"Gender 'is not in and of itself a justification for discriminating
between offenders' (Hall 1998, page B173-4). Yet, the results of the
multivariate modelling show that females are more likely than males
to receive community service, community programme or no sentence and
less likely to receive a prison sentence, periodic detention or a
monetary penalty. Thus, gender differences in sentencing persist even
after taking account of differences in the type and seriousness of
the offence committed (e.g. the average seriousness of offences committed
by women is lower than for men) and in the extent of previous offending
(e.g. women have fewer previous convictions on average; section 3.1).
Indeed, gender is the amongst the most significant variables influencing
the probability of receiving a community service sentence or a monetary
penalty."
So it is extremely likely that women are more likely than men to get
compensation -- especially as media such as Dyke TV constantly peddle
the myth that women are relatively badly off, which increases sympathy
for women, and gets them the pampered treatment they currently enjoy
throughout Society.
The Prisoners' and Victims' Claims Act 2005 is a very new piece of
legislation. There are not likely to be any statistics available yet
on what races or sexes get compensation under it, or how much. Section
3(1) states:
" (1)The purpose of subpart 1 of Part 2 is to restrict and guide
the awarding of compensation sought by specified claims in order to
help to ensure that the remedy of compensation is reserved for exceptional
cases and used only if, and only to the extent that, it is necessary
to provide effective redress. "
Obviously, the Act is designed not to be generous in its awards of
compensation. Because women are so pampered by
the media, however, all we need is a few more cases where women complain
about their compensation, and the pressure will be on to amend the Act
to make it less penny-pinching.